Funding major problem for NYIFF, says festival executive director

December 21, 2012  

An interview with Aroon Shivdasani, executive director of the New York Indian Film Festival and founder of the Indo American Arts council.

By Dr. Claus Mueller 

NEW YORK: The New York Indian Film Festival (NYIFF), which celebrated its 12th anniversary recently, was the first festival  in the United States devoted to Indian films and has grown to be the  largest and most influential; helping to set up several other Indian film festivals in the country.

Aroon Shivdasani (right), with director Mira Nair and Union Minister of State for Human Resources Development and novelist Shashi Tharoor.

Yet in spite of this promising background target or captive audience the festival faces issues common to other niche festivals. First there is the perennial funding problem and second is the question of how to best serve the Indian American community and others interested in Indian films.

Excerpts from an interview with the festival’s executive director, Aroon Shivdasani, who is also the founder of the IAAC, and a long-term patron of the arts in New York City:

Q. When you focused on a target audience whom did you start with?

A. We wanted mainstream America to see these films.  However, the first festival had an 80% audience from the Indian subcontinent.

Q. Is it currently still that high?

A. No, it now reaches out to all film aficionados.  However, we still have a South Asian audience of approximately 60% – the rest of the 40% is American.  You must remember that I am including the second generation Indian American in the South Asian audience.  This demographic is actually American – people like my children who were born in the US.

Q. Has there been a significant change?

A. Certainly, but there have been several other dramatic changes. The first couple of years most of the Diaspora films we received were still immature.  Less than two decades ago there were a handful of good Indian Diaspora film makers.  Our first film festival had only 12 films because that was the number of good Diaspora films we showed that year.   Indian diaspora filmmakers have matured over the last 12 years and we now have a plethora of films submitted to our festival.  However, we have also added Indian independent productions which increased our annual submission rise to over 300 for each festival – giving us problem that we enjoy – plenty of good films from which to choose our final program.

Q. So what was the mix of the 32 features and 24 shorts and documentaries you had this year?

A. Now we have more independent films than Diaspora films….Probably 60% are independent/art house/alternate and the remainder from the Diaspora. There has been a great increase of independent films submitted from India, which, by the way, are quite remarkable in content and quality as well as growth in the number of productions.

Q. How many films were submitted this year, including shorts?

A.Approximately 300.

Q. Do you carry in your festival traditional commercial Indian films such as Bollywood productions?

A. No – unless we were to program a retrospective of a great Indian director who has made a significant contribution to Indian cinema.  Our mission is to show the real India through our films, to give socially conscious films a platform, to encourage audiences to view a different kind of cinema.  Bollywood does not need us to do this for them.  They have a large captive audience of their own.  We often screen films that have commercial Indian cinema stars or directors – however those films are in the independent stream – smaller budgets, socially conscious plots or plots reflecting real lives and stories.  We screen features, documentaries and shorts.  I would love to screen Aamir Khan films – I do believe he has turned the tide of popular Indian cinema.  Bollywood audiences respond to his films because he is of that world despite the fact that he now produces films in the independent genre which means his independent films receive mass audiences.

Q. Let’s take another area. If you check the box office results of Indian films in the US it seems to be limited. Among the top scoring 100 foreign language films ranked since 1980 by Mojo, you will find only two Indian titles, Monsoon Wedding and Om Shanti Om.  So what is the contribution of your festival to get high quality independent productions and Diaspora films into distribution in the US?

A. First let us qualify your comment.  High quality Indian independent and Diaspora  films fall into the same category as the films shown in special venues such as the Film Forum, Lincoln Center , IFC, Quad  Cinemas,  Sunshine and the Angelia. One cannot place “foreign” films in the same category as the top grossing American films – their markets are completely different.  If we are talking about distribution, we need to keep in mind that our films are part of the foreign language film group  that play in art house theaters, the alternative  or specialty film markets.  Both known and unknown Indian Diaspora films have had successful screenings in these theatres: Mira Nair’s Monsoon Wedding and Namesake, Deepa Mehta’s Water, Gurinder Chadha’s Bride & Prejudice, David Kaplan’s ‘Today’s Special,’ Vikram Gandhi’s ‘Kumare’ and a host of others.

Q. But that market is also rather small. Foreign films grossed about $40 million out of a total box office running $11 billion last year. It is indeed a specialty market. But looking at specialty distribution, have you been able to track the films you are showing with respect to their subsequent use by art houses or theaters specializing in foreign and/or Indian films?

A. Yes, recently we have started to track our films. It is still a rather small percentage of Indian films that have received distribution here.   I mentioned some of them above – others include Mathew Joseph’s Bombay Summer, Rajnesh Domalpali’s Vanaja,   Srinivas Krishna’s Ganesh Boy Wonder, and Shonali Bose’s Amu.

Q. In some cases did they have prior distribution deals?

A. Yes, and in other cases distributors have picked them up at our festival e.g.  Vanaja, Today’s Special, Bombay Summer, Amu.

Q. Is there is a general problem cracking the specialty market, even if marketing support is provided?

A. Correct, we encourage film makers to bring their contacts from the industry. We provide passes to distributors and film financiers but also use the festival to reinforce audience appeal, and work the media. Further the festival program ensures that there is always a post-screening discussion which gives filmmakers a chance to talk to the audience about their films and allows the industry to recognize and approach them.

Q. But you do have an advantage over let’s say Italian or French festival films?  There is a sub circuit of Indian film theaters in the US films, not only lots of the mom and pop operations  but also theaters acquired and upgraded  by the  Reliance Big Theatre Circuit (they have about  30 by now). I understand that the success of these theaters with the Indian language audience has led to neighboring main line theaters to play Indian films now.

A. No, I don’t think so.  For one, mainstream America is already familiar with Italian and French films and filmmakers.  Indian independent filmmakers are still in their infancy with regard to visibility in the “foreign film” audience.   With regard to Indian mom and pop theaters – they are reluctant to play the productions we offer because they are not confident of the recurring audiences they get with Bollywood films.

Q. What if you have a commercially viable product?

A. Well, I believe we have to start inviting movie theater owners to our festival to show them the sold out houses for our films – in English, Hindi as well as all the other Indian regional languages.  In fact we have long lines of wait lists for several of our films.

Q. What about new distribution platforms, Video on Demand, special cable or satellite channels aimed at the Indian Diaspora audience; specialized circuits?  Reliance figures that there are about 4-5 million people in this country speaking Indian languages. Have you ever explored these new platforms?  

A. Yes, we are increasingly aware of these platforms.  I believe Star TV, Netflix and several other established online distribution platforms are already screening Indian films.  Several smaller ones have approached us to stream our films through them.  I think in 2013 we will move in that direction.  This year Mela attended our festival to invite filmmakers to stream their films through them.  Republic of Brown is interested in the same market, as are big companies like SONY and MTV.  The latter have very strict rules of compliance whereas the former are more laissez faire.    We have important Indian film content that can garner a whole new audience of film aficionados to these channels. These companies have approached us because they realize that we have become an important entry point for Indian content.  I have heard Rediff.com is thinking along those lines too although I wouldn’t swear to that.  Companies realize that there is a huge potential market in streaming good films that are not easily available after a one time screening at our film festival.  The Asian Indian population is one of the fastest growing ethnic groups in the US,   amounting to about three million people now.   People attending our festival frequently ask where they and their friends or relatives can view our films. We hope to give them concrete answers after our 2013 film festival.

Q. What is your current principal problem?

A. Money.  Funding has become a major problem.   Indian and US corporations don’t seem particularly interested.  We made some small steps this year. I hope their experience with our festival leads them to get more involved next year.  They were really happy with the exposure they received, the festival itself, as well as our audiences.   Limited funding precludes expansion and equally important it prevents providing better services to our audiences.

Q. What about public funding?

A. We receive small amounts from the federal, state and city governments.  However they are extremely small amounts to start with, and have been further slashed due to the economy.

Q. Can you identify other potentials sources?

A. We have approached several corporations; I hope some of them come through.  Individual giving has, to date, been extremely important.  Individuals who believe in our organization, its mission, and who are in turn equally pleased with the execution and results.

Q. What about official Indian agencies? They come to mind since I had a very positive response by government and private sector officials to a presentation I gave in New Delhi several years ago on the important role of Indian films in propagating Indian culture overseas.

A. ICCR (Indian Council for Cultural Relations) and the Consulate of India give us in kind support. The ICCR sends us artists and the Consulate hosts some of our receptions.  However, there is no monetary support.

Copyright (c) 2013-2014 The American Bazaar
More in Entertainment
"Kunal Nayyar, as Rajesh Koothrappali"
Hollywood no longer an unfriendly territory

A large pool of talent from the community finds success in the US entertainment industry.

Close